How to Enhance Smart Work Effectiveness as a Sustainable HRM Practice in the Tourism Industry

With the development of information technologies and increasing interest in sustainability, many companies have adopted smart work as a sustainable human resource practice. Moreover, the outbreak of Covid-19 has further promoted smart work in the workplace. However, the benefits and disadvantages of smart work are still under debate. In this regard, this study attempted to delve into how to enhance smart work implementation by exploring employees’subjectivity. Hana Tour, which is considered a good model of smart work in South Korea, was selected as a sample company. Q-methodology was employed to listen to employees’subjective opinions about smart work that they experienced. This study identified five types of smart work perceptions, namely, “self-development and energy saving,”“quality of personal life,”“job satisfaction,”“work engagement,”and “work–life balance”. Based on these five types, the theoretical and practical implications are discussed in the last chapter. Interestingly, the results showed that employees were not well aware of smart work effectiveness as one of the environmental protection practices in sustainability management paradigms. Another notable result was that employees were not concerned about the potential penalties of their engagement in smart work. During the current COVID-19 pandemic, the study’s findings are beneficial to the improvement of smart work implementation as a sustainable HRM practice in business.

Adverse Events Following Immunization Associated with the First and Second Doses of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Vaccine among Healthcare Workers in Korea.

As worldwide large-scale inoculation of novel vaccines is on the way, the importance of real-world data on safety cannot be overemphasized. We aimed to investigate the adverse events following immunization (AEFIs) associated with the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine among healthcare workers (HCWs). We investigated the systemic and local adverse events reported within seven days following the first and second doses of vaccination, using the mobile vaccine adverse events reporting system (MVAERS) developed by our hospital. The response rates were 71.8% (994/1384) and 52.9% (727/1375) after the first and second doses, respectively. The most commonly reported AEFIs were tenderness and pain at the injection site and fatigue after the first and second doses. In comparison to the first dose, the incidence and severity of AEFIs were lower following the second dose. Since the Korean government does not recommend the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination for those under 30 years of age, with greater risk than benefit, we additionally compared the AEFIs of age groups under and above 30 years of age. The overall incidence of AEFIs was similar in both the under and over 30 age groups. In conclusion, AEFIs associated with the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine were found to be tolerable, and AEFIs associated with the second dose were less common and severe compared to the first dose. Further safety surveillance studies on COVID-19 vaccines are required to validate our findings.

Adverse Events Following Immunization Associated with Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccination Reported in the Mobile Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System.

BACKGROUND: Vaccination against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is underway globally to prevent the infection caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. We aimed to investigate the adverse events following immunization (AEFIs) for COVID-19 among healthcare workers (HCWs). METHODS: This was a retrospective study of the AEFIs associated with the first dose of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine at the Kosin University Gospel Hospital from March 3 to March 22, 2021. We investigated the systemic and local adverse events during the 7 days following the vaccination using the Mobile Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (MVAERS) developed by our hospital. RESULTS: A total of 1,503 HCWs were vaccinated, and the data of 994 HCWs were reported in the MVAERS. The most commonly reported AEFIs were tenderness at the injection site (94.5%), fatigue (92.9%), pain at the injection site (88.0%), and malaise (83.8%). The severity of most AEFIs was mild-to-moderate, and the severity and number of AEFIs were less in the older age group. There were no serious events requiring hospitalization, and most AEFIs improved within a few days. CONCLUSION: The AEFIs associated with the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine were tolerable, and the use of the MVAERS was helpful in monitoring the AEFIs. The use of MVAERS will help in sharing accurate and ample information about vaccination against COVID-19.

The 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) causing severe ARDS: Serial computed tomography findings

Since mid-December 2019, a novel coronavirus (COVID-19) has spread to many countries around the world, and the number of critically ill patients with COVID-19 is increasing as the number infections increase. The optimum treatment and prognosis of the disease is still unknown. Here, we present the clinical course and serial computed tomography of a critically ill Korean patient with COVID-19. The progression of COVID-19 infection is fast and aggressive, and no treatment protocol has yet been established. Additional clinical data are required to determine whether or not corticosteroid use is clinically beneficial.

Beyond the fear: Nurses' experiences caring for patients with Middle East respiratory syndrome: A phenomenological study.

AIM AND OBJECTIVES: To explore the experiences of Korean nurses who had directly cared for patients with Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) and to derive the structure and meaning of these experiences. BACKGROUND: In 2015, the MERS epidemic struck Korea, and ill-prepared nurses had to care for patients with MERS. Nurses experienced conflict between their fear of the disease and their work and professional ethic. DESIGN: We employed a phenomenological qualitative approach. METHODS: Inductive, qualitative, in-depth interviews were performed with 17 nurses. The study process followed the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) checklist. RESULTS: The qualitative inductive content analysis generated seven theme clusters and 18 themes. The theme clusters were "Fear of Uncertainty," "Beyond Hesitation," "A Scene Like a Battlefield," "Chaotic Nursing Identity," "Buttresses for Sustainability," "Lingering Trauma" and "Expanded Horizon of Nursing." The final analysis revealed that the core theme was "Beyond the fear of uncertainty." CONCLUSIONS: This study contrives a more in-depth, holistic understanding by describing the experiences of nurses who directly cared for patients with MERS-the first large-scale infectious disease in Korea. Although nurses saw themselves as vital caregivers, they were frightened of the disease, had to work in a harsh environment, experienced various internal conflicts and had to deal with varying forms of uncertainty. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: This study sheds light on the nursing situation during crises involving serious infectious diseases; to combat these, more medical facilities are needed, and staff should be proactively guided on how to care for patients. It can serve as part of a good foundation for further study of medical staff during recurring epidemics.